By Stephanie Kelly and Scott DiSavino
NEW YORK (Reuters) -Energy executives at a Reuters conference on Wednesday urged shorter-term solutions such as efficiency and conservation during the current fuel supply crunch, saying companies must scramble to meet climate targets set for 2030.
Global oil and gas supplies have tightened and fuel costs have skyrocketed since Russia invaded Ukraine. The industry’s focus shifted toward supplying current energy demand, including ramping up coal production for power generation, which would increase greenhouse gas emissions.
Enel Chief Executive Francesco Starace said fallout from Russia’s Feb. 24 invasion has forced Europe to seek natural gas from other sources, but the focus on increasing fossil fuel supply to the region was just temporary.
“This is just a surviving tool to get out of this period of inflation,” Starace said at the Reuters Global Energy Transition 2022 conference in New York City.
Longer term, the Ukraine crisis will help boost Europe’s transition away from fossil fuels by demonstrating the danger of unreliable foreign supply. The Italian utility has decided to search for a buyer for its assets in Russia, Starace said.
“The real trend, as a consequence of the crisis in Ukraine, is we will see an acceleration in the renewable energy space,” he said, noting European countries can tap wind and solar power domestically and abroad.
Global CO2 emissions rose to historical highs in 2021, according to the International Energy Agency, as economies rebounded from the depths of the coronavirus pandemic and coal-fired generation surged. That will continue unless countries like the United States work on helping some nations shift to natural gas.
“Right now between India and China alone there is a plan to build close to 600 coal plants. They will operate for three and four decades; they will devastate the atmosphere’s carbon budget,” said Ralph Izzo, CEO of U.S. utility Public Service Enterprise Group (PSEG), on the sidelines of the conference. “We can help mitigate that by having them switch from coal to natural gas.”
The industry is not doing enough to reduce carbon emissions for the current decade, instead prioritizing solutions for after 2030, said Guillaume Le Gouic, senior vice president of power systems for Schneider Electric.
In the mining industry, some expect a supply crunch in the late 2020s, as late adopters of lower-carbon solutions hurry to execute renewable projects, said Keith Russell, a director of consultancy Partners In Performance. Too many projects are being left for later, Russell said.
Companies must tolerate some risk and failure when investing in renewable, as not all projects will make it to market, said Allyson Anderson Book, vice president for the energy transition at Baker Hughes.
“Not everything is going to win,” she said.
Some short-term opportunities include using hydrogen to power heavy-duty trucks, and using renewables to produce hydrogen, said Neil Navin, vice president for clean energy innovations at Southern California Gas (SoCalGas).
“There are many things that we need to do now that could have short-term impacts, but we need to look at those short-term opportunities while also planning for the change that’s going to require long-term investment in infrastructure,” Navin said on the conference sidelines. “We need to do both.”
A number of executives also recommended a carbon-pricing measure in the United States to help drive greener solutions.
“I don’t feel good about the pace at which we’re decarbonizing the power generation supply,” PSEG’s Izzo said. “We need congressional action to either put a price on carbon or pass the tax credits associated with renewable energy and nuclear power.”
(Reporting by Stephanie Kelly, Scott DiSavino, David Gaffen and Richard Valdmanis Editing by David Gregorio and Marguerita Choy)
